![]() ![]() Stil, it's defintely worth seeing if you have a strong stomach and haven't seen it. I understand, looking at imdb comments that this is a remake and I didn't know that before, but although this movie is very engrossing it doesn't get up to 10 status. Also, Gabriel Byrne and Bridget Fonda should have had more scenes together, their chemistry is what made the movie. The AMMOUNT of shootings, explosions etc detracts from the wonderful acting and powerful story at hand, they could have minimized the brutality A LITTLE. ![]() There are some negatives to: to much violence that seemed kind of for shock value, after awhile it becomes a bit much:ok we get the idea. Harvey Keitel was positively creepy as the Cleaner! There are some really-well- for lack of a better term icky scenes in the movie but the acting is first rate and holds your attention. Still it's a good movie, I think besides the incredible chemistry between Byrne and Fonda the story was moving and makes you want to know what happens nest. I wouldn't call this "dreary" as much as sometimes brutal with alot of violence. I thought Fonda and Byrne were incredible. I think this was a movie made good by the cast. He was great as Bob and the chemistry between him and maggie/Nina was overwhelming. I think Gabriel Byrne is what made this movie. Once I got past that, I really enjoyed this in a way that surprised me because it wouldn't be the type of pic I'd usally watch. ![]() etina (cs) Deutsch (de) English (en) EspaƱol (es). This IS a really brutal movie-I usually don't like violence in movies but in this case the violence was sort of neccessary for the overall subject at hand. The Return of Superman by Louise Simonson, September 3, 1993, DC Comics edition, Paperback in English. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |